What To Consider Before Getting A Second Opinion On A Personal Injury Case

Sometimes, if a personal injury lawyer has refused to take a certain case, that same attorney might encourage the prospective client to consult with another member of the legal community. Yet, at other times, one of the many personal injury lawyers might declare a presented case to be one that does not seem like a sure win.

If you were to get caught in that second situation, then you might have to weigh the benefits and drawbacks that would be associated with an effort that was aimed at obtaining a second opinion.

The general rule on finding the best lawyer for a given case:

A bigger case should be handled by a legal mind that has gained an appreciable amount of experience. An experienced Personal Injury Lawyer in Kelowna tends to win a larger compensation for his or her client. Hence, a complex case could call-for the advocacy of an experienced attorney.

The question that all personal injury lawyers ask, with respect to a possible client’s case:

All of the lawyers that have chosen to specialize in that area of the law have this question in their mind, when meeting with a possible client: Just how much is this particular case worth? Personal injury lawyers do not like to take a case that does not seem like a sure win.

Realize that every personal injury attorney gets paid a contingency fee. If the other party wins the case, the legal counsel for the plaintiff does not get any money. That fact helps explain a lawyer’s reluctance to take certain cases.

What a client should consider before seeking a second opinion?

How experienced is the member of the legal community that has refused to take your case? Do you feel that another, more experienced attorney might have a different opinion, regarding your case’s worth? If you think that you should answer “yes,” then it would seem logical to go after a second opinion.

Of course, every lawyer has amassed a different set of experiences. You will need to find an attorney that has learned a good deal about the types of issues that will be of concern to all involved with the negotiations, or perhaps with a scheduled trial.

Perhaps you have been provided with the name of someone that can claim a larger amount of experience than the person you consulted with earlier. If that name came from someone you know and respect, such as a helpful co-worker, then you might want to schedule a meeting.

During that meeting, you might be provided with a second opinion. There is no guarantee that it would differ from the opinion that you got earlier. You might have to face the facts about your case.