Risks Associated With Failure To Wear Helmet While Riding Motorcycle

Most motorcycle riders have heard that by wearing a helmet, a bike rider can decrease the chances for sustaining a serious injury. This warning gets repeated so frequently, that some daring (or foolish) riders get tired of hearing it and proceed to ignore it. In order to limit the times when such a mistake gets made, this article looks more closely at the basis for the repeated warning.

The 3 ways that the chances of an injury diminish when a motorcyclist dons a helmet

The helmet’s presence reduces the likelihood that some external force will have an impact on the rider’s brain. That is the type of force that can trigger development of a traumatic brain injury.

A helmet-wearer does not invite occurrence of the sort of event that encourages development of a whiplash-type injury. Some part of the brain can get damaged if that vital organ gets jarred in some fashion and then hits the inside of the skull. When the skull has been covered by a cushioning helmet, the chances for that happening decrease.

The last example seems all too obvious. A head protected by a hard surface, such as the one associated with helmets, cannot be easily penetrated. Without such headgear, a motorcyclist could fall from the bike’s seat, allowing his or her head to hit some sharp object on the road’s surface.

A special warning for motorcyclists in British Columbia

Like the motorist that live in that same Canadian province, an injured motorcycle rider must file a claim with ICBC in Surrey, if he or she hopes to get compensated for those same injuries. Yet if ICBC were to discover that the same claimant had failed to obey the helmet-wearing law, then the dollar amount of the claimant’s compensation could be reduced. According to ICBC’s rules, that person’s desire to remain helmet-free would allow the Corporation to charge him or her with contributory negligence.

In Canada, the phrase contributory negligence does not have the same meaning that it does in the United States. A Canadian that has been held guilty of contributory negligence faces the same consequences as a US citizen that gets charged with compensatory negligence. In other words, he or she gets a certain portion of what would have been a court awarded compensation removed from the particular sum of money. It is best to talk with an Accident Lawyer in Surrey.

For a motorcyclist, the amount taken out equals the portion of the fault that falls on the motorcyclist’s shoulders. That portion will vary, and will depend on the degree to which the other party has committed either an egregious or a minor offense. For instance, had that same driver chosen to ignore a major traffic law, or simply committed a minor infraction?